Acts of independent significance
Categories: Law stubs | Wills and trusts
Part of the common law series
|
|---|
| Inheritance |
| Intestacy · Testator · Probate |
| Power of appointment |
| Simultaneous death · Slayer rule |
| Disclaimer of interest |
| Types of will |
| Holographic will · Will contract |
| Living will |
| Joint wills and mutual wills |
| Parts of a will |
| Codicil · Attestation clause |
| Incorporation by reference |
| Residuary clause |
| Problems of property disposition |
| Lapse and anti-lapse |
| Ademption · Abatement |
| Acts of independent significance |
| Elective share · Pretermitted heir |
| Contesting a will |
| Testamentary capacity · Undue influence |
| Types of Trusts |
| Express trust · Asset-protection trust |
| Protective trust · Spendthrift trust |
| Charitable trust · Honorary trust |
| Resulting trust · Constructive trust |
| Special Needs trust |
| Doctrines governing trusts |
| Pour-over will · Cy pres doctrine |
| Other areas of the common law |
| Contract law · Tort law · Property law |
| Criminal law · Evidence |
| view /edit this template |
The doctrine of acts of independent significance, in the common law of wills, permits the testator to effectively change the disposition of her property without changed her will, if acts or events with relation to the property itself have some significance beyond avoiding the requirements of the will.
The doctrine is most frequently applied in two circumstance:
- The testator devises property to a class of beneficiaries where the testator controls membership of the class. For example, Joey leaves the contents of his bank account "to my employees". If Joey then fires some of his old employees and hires new ones, the new employees will inherit the contents of the bank account under this provision.
- The testator devises general categories or types of property, and then changes the specific items of property within that category or type. For example, Joey writes in his will, "I leave my car to Rachel". At the time of the writing, Joey drives a 1974 AMC Gremlin; however, Joey later sells the Gremlin and purchases a Rolls Royce. Because the purpose for switching vehicles is to provide Joey with a more comfortable ride, and not to change the will without going through the appropriate testamentary formalities, the gift to Rachel remains enforceable.