Ottoman Empire

Categories: Wikipedia cleanup | 1911 Britannica | Ottoman Empire | Turkic peoples | Former countries in Europe | Empires

The Ottoman State (Ottoman Turkish: دولتِ عَليه عُثمانيه, Devlet-i Aliye-i Osmaniye; Modern Turkish: Osmanlı Devleti), commonly called the Ottoman Empire (Modern Turkish: Osmanlı Imparatorlugu) was an imperial power, centered around the borders of the Mediterranean Sea, that existed from 1299 to 1922. At the height of its power in the 16th century, it included Anatolia, the Middle East, parts of North Africa, much of south-eastern Europe to the Caucasus in the north. It comprised an area of about 5.5 million km², though much of this was under indirect control of the central government. The Empire was situated in the middle of East and West, and interacted throughout its six-century history with both the East and the West.

It was established by a tribe of Oghuz Turks in western Anatolia, and was ruled by the Osmanlı dynasty, the descendants of those Turks. The Empire was founded by Osman I (in Arabic ʿUthmān, عُثمَان , hence the name Ottoman Empire). In 1453, after the Ottomans captured Constantinople (modern İstanbul), the last remnant of the Byzantine Empire, it became the Ottomans' third capital. In the 16th and 17th centuries, the Ottoman Empire was among the world's most powerful political entities, and the countries of Europe felt threatened by its steady advance through the Balkans.

At its highest point, the Empire contained many of the important places of classical antiquity, including Homer's Olympus and Dardenus, Zeus' Europa, Io's Bosporus, temple of Diana in Ephesus, sarcophagus of Alexander the Great, the Garden of Eden, Noah's Mount Ararat, Abraham's oasis and wells, Nile, Mount of the Sermon, the Hill of Golgotha.

The dissolution of the Ottoman Empire was a consequence of World War I, when Allied forces including the Arabs and Armenians eventually defeated Ottoman forces in the Middle East. At the end of the war the Ottoman government collapsed completely; and the empire was divided among the victorious powers, with the signing of the Treaty of Sevres. The Treaty of Sevres put the Ottoman state into complete disarray. Its armies were ordered to be disbanded and Ottomans lost their sovereignty. The following couple of years ended with declarations of new states. One of the new states was Republic of Turkey. Turkish nationalists established modern Turkey as an outcome of the Turkish War of Independence, mostly on what was to become Turkish soil, as of the Treaty of Lausanne, in 1923. This new state delivered the 'coup de grâce' to the Ottoman state in 1922, with the overthrow of Sultan Mehmet VI Vahdettin by the new Republican assembly of Turkey. The members of the Ottoman dynasty were banned from the lands of Anatolia, where they once built one of the great empires of the world. In 1999, Turkey's parliament granted Turkish citizenship to the members of the Ottoman family, after 76 years.

Time line

 id:canvas  value:rgb(0.97,0.97,0.97)
 id:white  value:rgb(1,1,1)
 id:subtitle  value:gray(0.8)
 id:grid1   value:gray(0.7)
 id:grid2   value:gray(0.88)
 id:black   value:rgb(0,0,0)
 id:events value:rgb(0.75,1,0.75)
 id:mark1   value:rgb(0,0.7,0)
 id:mark2    value:rgb(0.7,0,0)
 id:years    value:gray(0.5)
 id:period1  value:rgb(1,1,0)
 id:period2  value:rgb(1,0.75,0)
 id:retired   value:rgb(1,0.60,0.50) legend:Retired
 id:forced   value:claret            legend:Forced_Out
 id:killed   value:magenta           legend:Killed
 id:qaz      value:rgb(0.9,0.8,0.8)
 id:zaq value:rgb(0.9,0.4,0.4)
 id:eastern   value:rgb(0.7,0.8,0.8)
 id:western value:rgb(0.7,0.4,0.4)
 id:Mil value:rgb(1,0.8,0.4) 
 id:Soc value:rgb(1,0.4,0.8) 

 bar:title_sultans
 bar:sultans1
 bar:sultans2
 bar:sultans3
 bar:sultans4
 bar:title_events
 barset:events
 bar:dummy2 # separator
 bar:title_periods
 bar:periods

 mark:(line,black)

 fontsize:XS
 width:13

 shift:(5,-6)

 bar:title_sultans    from:start till:end text:Ottoman_Rulers fontsize:M anchor:middle align:center width:10 color:subtitle
 bar:title_events     from:start till:end text:"Events" fontsize:M anchor:middle align:center width:10 color:subtitle mark:(line,white)
 bar:title_periods    from:start till:end text:"Periods" fontsize:M anchor:middle align:center width:10 color:subtitle mark:(line,white)

 shift:(5,-5)
 fontsize:S
 mark:(line,Mil)

 color:events
 
 barset:events
 at:1389 text:Kossovo
 at:1453 text:Istanbul
 at:1514 text:Chaldiran
 from:1683 till:1699 shift:(1,-5) text:"Holy League"
 barset:break
 at:1683 text:Vienna
 from:1718  till:1730 shift:(1,-5) color:pink text:Tulip
 from:1839 till:1922 shift:(1,-5) text:Natonalism
 from:1789  till:1842 shift:(1,-5) color:pink text:Military Reform
 from:1676 till:1917 shift:(1,-5) text:"Russo-Turkish"
 barset:break
 from:1821 till:1832 shift:(1,-5) text:"Greek"
 from:1839 till:1876 shift:(1,-5) color:pink text:Tanzimat
 at:1798 text:Eygpt
 from:1908 till:1918 shift:(-10,-5) color:pink text:II.Constitution

 barset:break
 from:1876 till:1880 shift:(1,-7) color:pink text:I.Constitution

 mark:(none,mark2)
 color:retired
 width:22
 align:left

 bar:sultans1
 from:1281 till:1326 shift:(1,0) fontsize:XS text:"Osman I"
 from:1413 till:1421 shift:(-4,0) fontsize:XS text:"Mehmed I"
 from:1451 till:1481 shift:(1,0) fontsize:XS text:"Mehmed II"
 from:1520 till:1566 shift:(1,0) fontsize:XS text:"Suleiman I"
 from:1617 till:1618 shift:(-12,0) fontsize:XS color:forced text:"Mustafa I"
 from:1618 till:1622 shift:(1,-7) fontsize:XS color:killed   text:"Osman II"
 from:1648 till:1687 shift:(1,0) fontsize:XS color:forced   text:"Mehmed IV"
 from:1703 till:1730 shift:(1,-7) fontsize:XS color:forced   text:"Ahmed III"
 from:1808 till:1839 shift:(1,0) fontsize:XS text:"Mahmud II"
 from:1876 till:1909 shift:(1,0) fontsize:XS color:forced   text:"Abd-ul-Hamid II"

 bar:sultans2
 from:1326 till:1359 shift:(1,0) fontsize:XS text:"Orhan I"
 from:1445 till:1451 shift:(-4,0) fontsize:XS text:"Murad II"
 from:1481 till:1512 shift:(1,-7) fontsize:XS text:"Beyazid II"
 from:1574 till:1595 shift:(-4,0) fontsize:XS text:"Murad III"
 from:1622 till:1623 shift:(1,0) fontsize:XS color:forced   text:"Mustafa I"
 from:1687 till:1691 shift:(-8,0) fontsize:XS text:"Suleiman II"
 from:1730 till:1754 shift:(1,-7) fontsize:XS text:"Mahmud I"
 from:1774 till:1789 shift:(1,0) fontsize:XS text:"Abd-ul-Hamid I"
 from:1839 till:1861 shift:(1,-7) fontsize:XS text:"Abd-ul-Mejid"
 from:1909 till:1918 shift:(1,0) fontsize:XS text:"Mehmed V"

 bar:sultans3 
 from:1359 till:1389 shift:(1,0) fontsize:XS text:"Murad I"
 from:1421 till:1444 shift:(1,0) fontsize:XS text:"Murad II"
 from:1566 till:1574 shift:(-4,-7) fontsize:XS text:"Selim II"
 from:1595 till:1603 shift:(1,0) fontsize:XS text:"Ahmed I"
 from:1623 till:1640 shift:(1,-7) fontsize:XS text:"Murad IV"
 from:1691 till:1695 shift:(1,0) fontsize:XS text:"Ahmed II"
 from:1754 till:1757 shift:(1,-7) fontsize:XS text:"Osman III"
 from:1789 till:1807 shift:(1,0) fontsize:XS color:killed   text:"Selim III"
 from:1861 till:1876 shift:(1,0) fontsize:XS color:killed   text:"Abd-ul-Aziz"
 from:1918 till:1922 shift:(1,0) fontsize:XS color:forced   text:"Mehmed VI"

 bar:sultans4 
 from:1389 till:1402 shift:(1,0) fontsize:XS text:"Beyazid I"
 from:1444 till:1445 shift:(1,0) fontsize:XS text:"Mehmed II"
 from:1512 till:1520 shift:(1,0) fontsize:XS text:"Selim I"
 from:1640 till:1648 shift:(1,0) fontsize:XS color:killed   text:"Ibrahim I"
 from:1695 till:1703 shift:(1,-7) fontsize:XS text:"Mustafa II"
 from:1757 till:1774 shift:(1,0) fontsize:XS text:"Mustafa III"
 from:1807 till:1808 shift:(1,0) fontsize:XS color:killed  text:"Mustafa IV"
 from:1876 till:1876 shift:(1,0) fontsize:XS color:forced   text:"Murad V"

bar:periods
 at:start shift:(2, 20) fontsize:XS text:<Middle Ages
 at:1453  shift:(2, 22) fontsize:XS text:<Early Modern Europe
 at:1789 shift:(2, 22) fontsize:XS text:<Modern Europe
 at:1500  shift:(2, 7) fontsize:XS text:<---Northern Renaissance
 at:1789  shift:(2, 7) fontsize:XS text:<---French Revolution
 width:9
 from:start till:1299 shift:(-10,-8) color:orange text:Early_Stage
 from:1299  till:1453 shift:(6,-8)  color:skyblue text:Rise
 from:1453  till:1683 shift:(4,-8)  color:brightgreen text:Growth
 from:1683  till:1827 shift:(4,-8) color:teal text:Stagnation
 from:1827  till:1914 shift:(4,-8)  color:yellow  text:Decline
 from:1915  till:1923 shift:(4,-8)  color:pink align:center text:Dissolution

 at:1453  color:green
 at:1789  color:skyblue 

For more details on this topic, see Timeline of the Ottoman Empire.

History

The Ottoman State originated as a Beylik within the Seljuk Empire in the 13th century. In 1299, Osman I declared independence of the Ottoman Principality.

Rise (1299-1453)

Main article: Rise of the Ottoman Empire

With the rise of the empire, the characteristics and nature of the state were defined, and the Ottomans definitively carved out their own preserve in history under the rule of Mehmed II.

Even though Ottoman state existed before Osman I, he is regarded as the founder of the Empire, having given it its name and being the first bey to declare his independence. He extended the frontiers of the empire towards the Greek Empire, while other Turkish beyliks suffered from infighting. Under Osman I, the Ottoman capital was moved to Bursa. Osman was an excellent lawgiver and judge, under whom Greeks, Turks, Muslims, and Christians enjoyed equal protection both man and property. He published the first coin under his name, demonstrating the trust he built. For the coming centuries his time was recalled with the words "May he be as good as Osman".

For more details on this topic, see Fall of Constantinople.

the Conqueror also enjoyed the full support of the empire. He used this to reorganize the state structure and military.

Growth (1453-1683)

Main article: Growth of the Ottoman Empire

Throughout the 1500's, the Empire continued to grow in size and extent, expanding into North Africa in the southwest, and battling with the Shi'ia Islamic Safavid Empire of re-emergent Persia, to the east. At the Battle of Chaldiran in eastern Anatolia (modern-day Turkey, west of Tabriz), in 1514, Ottoman forces under Sultan Selim I won a decisive victory against the Safavids, ensuring Ottoman security on their eastern front. Thereafter, attention reverted to the west, and Suleiman I, upon ascending the throne in 1518, led a series of campaigns into the Balkans. Under Suleiman, a brilliant strategist, the Ottomans advanced steadily northward, taking Belgrade, the capital of Serbia in 1521, defeating Hungary in 1526, and besieging Vienna in 1529.

In addition to gaining considerable territory during its expansionistic period, the Empire extended its influence at sea. Selim I conquered the Safavid Empire, only to lose it soon after; the Safavids later defeated and conquered the eastern Ottomans, and captured Baghdad. The Empire established a navy in the Red Sea that succeeded, at least for a while, in countering Portuguese influence on the spice trade. During this period, the Empire vied with the emerging European colonial powers, in the Indian Ocean. Fleets, with soldiers and arms, were sent to support Muslim rulers in Kenya and Aceh (on the northern tip of the island of Sumatra), and to defend the Ottoman spice and slave trades. In Aceh, the Ottomans built a fortress, and supplied it with huge cannon. The Dutch Protestants were at first helped by the Ottomans in their struggle against Catholic Spain. The Ottoman navy also had much influence in the Mediterranean Sea, and trade there flourished, because of the stability afforded to the shipping lanes. Accordingly, the period would become known as the "Pax Ottomanica".

The Siege of Vienna was not part of an Ottoman extension into Germany. The Turks wanted to react to interventions of Spanish Hapsburg interference into Hungary. But this turned some of the Ottoman allies against it. The Pope abandoned his secular interests, to agitate for a general Crusade against the Ottoman Empire. With the coming decades, the Ottoman Empire was not just an occupying force; it became an instrument in European politics. The Battle of Vienna brought a long period of stagnation, as it was a turning point in the 300-year struggle between the forces of the Central European kingdoms and the Ottoman Empire.

Stagnation (1683-1827)

Main article: Stagnation of the Ottoman Empire

Eventually, after the defeat at the Battle of Vienna, in 1683, it was clear that the Ottoman Empire was no longer a superpower in Europe. In 1699, for the first time in its history, the Ottomans acknowledged that the Austrian empire could sign a treaty with the Ottomans on equal terms, and actually lost a large territory which had been in Ottoman possession for two centuries. There was a long succession of sultans after that, who were not as good as the generation of Mehmed II, Selim I and Suleyman I.

For more details on this topic, see Russo-Turkish Wars.

During the stagnation, the Ottomans were weakened both internally and externally by costly wars, especially against Persia, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, Russia and Austria-Hungary. The Russo-Turkish Wars were a series of ten wars, fought between the Russian Empire and the Turkish-ruled Ottoman Empire during the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries. It was one of the longest conflicts in European history, spanning 241 years; far longer than the Hundred Years' War between England and France. Before that, the Ottoman Empire suffered a huge naval loss at the Battle of Lepanto, in 1571. Although the Ottoman fleet quickly recovered from this singular defeat, the event was significant, in that it showed Christian Europe that the mighty Ottoman Empire was not as invincible as had been previously thought.

For more details on this topic, see Tulip Era in the Ottoman Empire.

The Treaty of Passarowitz produced a short, peaceful era between 1718-1730. The change in Ottoman policies toward Europe already had given its signals. The Empire began to improve the cities along the Balkans, that would become their defense against the expansionist movements of the Europeans. More public policies were sought, such as drops in the taxation rates; public relations improvements, such as the institution of consulates, and the first civilian industrial investments all fall into this period. It was called the "Tulip Era" as this motif was extensively used. However, the scientific advantage the Ottomans had over the European countries constantly being diminished. While the Ottomans were stagnating in a stale-mate with their European and Asian neighboring countries, the European development went into over-drive. The Ottoman Empire failed to keep up technologically with its European rivals, especially Russia.

For more details on this topic, see Ottoman Military Reform Efforts.

The late eighteenth century saw the Ottoman Empire fall behind the West, militarily as well. Wars and territories were lost, to Austria and Russia. Areas of the empire such as Egypt, became independent in all but name only. During this time, begining with Selim III, there were efforts to modernize the system. Many of the reforms the sultans tried to impose to revitalise the Empire, were reverted by conservative forces within the Empire, either by the religious cadre, or by the now-corrupt Janissaries, even after the Janissaries were disbanded in 1826.

Decline (1828-1908)

Main article: Fall of the Ottoman Empire

A significant change was this: the Empire stopped going into conflicts alone, and started entering into alliances with European countries. There was a series of alliances with countries such as France, Holland, Britain and Russia. A prime example of this was the Crimean War, in which the English, French, Ottomans and others united against Tsarist Russia.

For more details on this topic, see Tanzimat.

The Tanzimat was a period of reform, that lasted from 1839 to 1876. During this time, a fairly modern conscripted army was formed. The banking system was also reformed, and the guilds were replaced with modern factories. Economically, the Empire had trouble re-paying the loans to European banks. Militarily, it had trouble defending itself from foreign occupation (e.g. Egypt was occupied by the French in 1798; Cyprus was occupied by the British in 1876, etc.).

For more details on this topic, see Rise of Nationalism under the Ottoman Empire.

Of all the ideas that Ottomans acquired from west; the ethnic nationalism, or named at that time as religion of the modern world was the most influential ideology. Ethnic nationalism was not just foreign to the Ottomans, but also a destructional concept to their Millet understanding. Ottoman system did not include provisions to handle the fights within the religious blocks. Ottomans were not just dealing ethnic nationalism within their boundaries, but cross boundaries. Shaykh Ubaydullah uprisings using religious bigotry during the 1880 had many effects on other groups during the 19th century. It was also claimed that these uprising determined the path that Ottomans had to take during the 20th century. The rhetoric regarding the cause of 19th century uprisings are sharply divided. Western historians blame the Ottoman Empire for the developments. Ottomans claim that source of the inter-ethnic conflicts should be seek within their dynamics and the sources that were supporting. Also, the decline period had many achievements, such as organization of the economy, military, communication, etc, but if the Ottoman state was strong and influential on such detail is another question. The answer to this might be in the course of coming events.

For more details on this topic, see I Constitutional Era in the Ottoman Empire.

National uprisings forced the Ottomans to do something. In the course of six centuries, everything had changed except the form of government. With the help of Tanzimat there was a group of Ottomans who were educated in western universities and believed that constitutional monarchy could create an ease to the social unrest in the Empire. İttihat ve Terakki Cemiyeti had strong connections to these elite groups. Mesrutiyet Era explains the political and social dynamics of the first constitution written by İttihat ve Terakki Cemiyeti and its social and economical consequences. Through a military coup, İttihat ve Terakki Cemiyeti had forced Sultan Abdülaziz to leave his position to Murad V. However, Murad V was mentally ill. Sultan Abdülaziz had to be called back under the promise that he would ease the way to a constitutional monarch. Sultan Abdülaziz changed the centuries old state structure at 23 November 1876. He declared the name of the new constitution as Kanun-i Esasi. The social consequences of the first constitution were very interesting. Often, when a nation copies the finished experience of other civilized societies, without going through the intermediate stages first, the rules that were set in the constitution that defined the relationships among the people had no function.

By the end of the 19th century, the Ottoman Empire was signalling the chaotic years ahead: reforms were not enough to make up the difference, and not enough to stop the now-inevitable dissolution of the Empire.

Dissolution (1908-1922)

Main article: Dissolution of the Ottoman Empire

The dissolution period begins with the onset of II. Constitutional government.

For more details on this topic, see II Constitutional Era in the Ottoman Empire.

Three new Balkan states were shaped during the end of the 19th century. All three as well as Montenegro sought additional territories within the large Turkish-ruled regions known as Albania, Macedonia, and Thrace. The background to the wars lies in the incomplete emergence of nation-states on the fringes of the Ottoman Empire during the nineteenth century. Initially under the encouragement of Russia, a series of agreements were concluded: between Serbia and Bulgaria in March 1912 and between Greece and Bulgaria in May 1912. Montenegro subsequently concluded agreements between Serbia and Bulgaria respectively in October 1912. The Serbian- Bulgarian agreement specifically called for the partition of Macedonia, that resulted with the First Balkan War. The second Balkan War followed the first.

For more details on this topic, see Balkan Wars.

In a final effort to keep power in their hands by regaining at least some of the lost territories, the triumvirate led by Enver Pasha joined the Central Powers in World War I. The Ottoman Empire had some successes in the beginning years of the war. The Allies, including the newly formed ANZACs were defeated in Gallipoli, Iraq and the Balkans, and some territories were regained. In the Caucasus Ottomans lost ground in a series of battles and Russians moved to a line from Trabzon, Erzurum, to Van. The Russian revolution gave the Ottomans a chance to regain these areas. The Ottomans were eventually defeated at the end of the war by the Allies, Arabs, and Republic of Armenia, which Armenian Republic was being declared during the war, in contrast to Arap nations. Ottoman territories were annexed. The initial agreement was Mundros treaty. After the Serves treaty, August 10, 1920, the life of the Ottoman Empire practically ended. After a century, what it seems came out of Serves was the achievement of British policy in the Near East. Great Britain had obtained most of her desires, in the partition of the Ottoman Empire.

For more details on this topic, see World War I.

However, for other powers of Entente, we have to look at the results of Turkish War of Independence. Turks were raise against the Serves, to expel the Greeks, Republic of Armenia, Italians, French and to threaten the British in the region of Straits. Finally Turks assert their right to an independent national existance.

For more details on this topic, see Turkish War of Independence.

Turkish independence resulted with the 'coup de grâce' to the Ottoman state, almost mercifully, in 1922, with the overthrow of Sultan Mehmet VI Vahdettin by the new republican assembly of Turkey. Republic of Turkey was founded on October 29, 1923 from the remnants of the empire, like many other states.

National Histories

    id:console       value:rgb(0.9,0.3,0.3)
    id:consolealt    value:rgb(0.3,0.9,0.9)
    id:line          value:black
    id:liteline      value:rgb(0.3,0.3,0.3)
    id:bg            value:white
    id:projection    value:rgb(0.9,0.9,0.9)
    id:Europe        value:coral      legend:Europe
    id:Anatolia      value:skyblue    legend:Anatolia
    id:MiddleEast    value:drabgreen  legend:Middle_East
    id:Africa        value:redorange  legend:Africa

 pos:(70,258) textcolor:red fontsize:M  text:National Histories

   textcolor:black align:center shift:(0,-4) 
 bar:Hun from:1526 till:1718 color:Europe text:"Hungary"
 bar:Mol from:1512 till:1792 color:Europe text:"Moldova"
 bar:Her from:1482 till:1878 color:Europe text:"Herzegovina"
 bar:Cri from:1475 till:1774 color:Europe text:"Crimea"
 bar:Bos from:1463 till:1878 color:Europe text:"Bosnia"
 bar:Gre from:1453 till:1832 color:Europe text:"Greece"
 bar:Bul from:1396 till:1878 color:Europe text:"Bulgaria"
 bar:Alb from:1385 till:1913 color:Europe text:"Albenia"
 bar:Ser from:1371 till:1791 color:Europe text:"Serbia"
 bar:Con from:1453 till:1922 color:Europe text:Istanbul
 bar:Bur from:1339 till:1918 color:Anatolia text:"Bursa"
 bar:Sog from:1299 till:1918 color:Anatolia text:"Sogut"
 bar:Tra from:1450 till:1918 color:Anatolia text:"Trabzon"
 bar:Kon from:1460 till:1918 color:Anatolia text:"Konya"
 bar:Van from:1500 till:1880 color:Anatolia text:"Van"

 bar:Syr from:1530 till:1918 color:MiddleEast text:"Syria"
 bar:Bag from:1540 till:1918 color:MiddleEast text:"Bagdat"
 bar:Mus from:1550 till:1918 color:MiddleEast text:"Musul"

 bar:Eqy from:1517 till:1882 color:Africa text:"Eqypt"
 bar:Alg from:1518 till:1830 color:Africa text:"Algeria"
 bar:Tun from:1534 till:1881 color:Africa text:"Tunis"
 bar:Tri from:1551 till:1918 color:Africa text:"Tripoli"

 layer:front                                            # all lines in front of bars unless stated otherwise
 at:1551                         color:yellow              
 at:1718                         color:yellow              
 at:1791                         color:yellow              
 at:1914                         color:yellow              
 at:1886                         color:yellow              
points:(364,270)(504,249)     color:blue    width:2
points:(504,249)(533,196)     color:blue    width:2

State

There are some Ottoman State characters which did not change throughout the centuries.

In diplomatic circles, the empire was often referred to as the Sublime Porte or the Porte, from the French translation of the Ottoman: بابِ علی Bâb-i-âlî ("great gate"), the grand Palace Gate of the Imperial Topkapı Palace, where the sultan greeted foreign ambassadors. It has also been interpreted as referring to the Empire's (and especially the capital Istanbul's) position as "gateway" between Europe and Asia. In its day, the Ottoman Empire was also commonly referred to as the Turkish Empire or Turkey by Westerners, though it should not be confused with the modern nation-state of Turkey.

The Ottomans were administrators and not producers, except for the Turkish peasants producing foodstuff. The Ottoman Empire was not the program of economic exploitation, like the colonial empires of the modern Europe states. The government under Ottoman understanding was shaped around defending the land, building the security and harmony within the land. Against the common belief among the Christians, the source of violence during the last years of Ottoman Empire was the nation building process, not the Ottoman way of administration.

Sultans

Main article: Osmanli

The Sultan, was the sole regent and government of the empire, at least officially.

The dynasty is most often called the Osmanli or the House of Osman. The first rulers called themselves bey thereby acknowledging the sovereignty of the Seljuk sultanate and its successor the Ilkhanate sultanate. Murad I was the first Ottoman to claim the title of "sultan" (king). With the capture of Constantinople in 1453, the state was on its way to becoming a mighty empire, with Mehmed II as its emperor, or padishah, in Europe sometimes the Grand Turk. From 1517 onwards, the Ottoman Sultan was also the Caliph of Islam, and the Ottoman Empire was from 1517 until 1922 (or 1924) synonymous with the Caliphate, the Islamic State. The sultan enjoyed many titles such as Sovereign of the House of Osman, Sultan of Sultans, Khan of Khans, and from 1517 onwards, Commander of the Faithful and Successor of the Prophet of the Lord of the Universe, i.e. Caliph, which theoretically also gave him overlordship over other Muslim rulers around the world. For example, among the Mughal Emperors of India, only Aurangzeb had the Khutba read in his own name.

Organization

Main article: State organization of the Ottoman Empire

Although the Ottoman state had many reorganizations, several main structures remained the same. There was a person who was totally responsible, always in command of the state. That was called the Sultan of the Empire. The decisions were always taken by a court of people at the divan, with the last word on Sultan. At the initial stages, court was composed from the elders of the tribe. Then it was modified to include professionals from military and local elites, such as high-ranking religious and political advisors. They were named as the viziers. This structure was later modified to include Grand Vizier to lift of some of the responsibilities from the Sultan. The Sublime Porte was the open court of the Sultan, named after the gate to the headquarters to the Grand Vizier, where the sultan held the greeting ceremony for foreign ambassadors. At times, the Grand Vizier became as or more important than the Sultan. From 1908 onwards the state was constitutional monarch without executive powers, with parliament consisting of chosen representatives from the provinces.

Subdivisions

Main article: Subdivisions of the Ottoman Empire

Even though there is no election, there was a very interesting democratic structure within the Ottoman State. From an outside view, Ottoman state organization was based on a hierarchy with the Sultan, but there were many historical incidences that local governors acted by their own, sometimes just opposite of the Sultan. There are eleven incidences that Sultans were dethroned as they were perceived threats to the state. Sultans were chosen from the sons of the previous Sultan, but one has to understand the educational system and how it eliminates the unfit, or builds a common trust among the ruling elite for the son before they were throned. There were only two failed attempts to overthrow the ruling family, which suggests an extreme political stability.

At the height of its power, the Ottoman Empire had 29 provinces plus three tributary principalities and Transylvania, a kingdom which swore allegiance to the Porte.

Failures of the state

Main article: Failures of the Ottoman Empire

The fall of the Ottoman state is attributed to the failure of its economic structure. Many of the Ottoman Empire's failures are commonly attributed to an inability to establish economic and political hegemony over other nations, despite the fact that it was an empire. The term "the sick man of Europe" originated from these frustrations.

Without economic participation the inns, hospitals, libraries, or indeed on this term any public benefit depended on public investments, named as vakif. The economy of the Ottoman state was no match to its counterparts.

With the change of trade roads, the Ottoman Empire lost its main income source. Inability to industrialize the state and a too great a dependence on farmers as a source of revenue through taxation were also factors.

Inefficiencies originated from the size of the empire were also significant. Trying to keep the empire intact through internal and external wars was a costly process which compromised the Ottoman Empire's capacity to introduce reform.

With improvements in communication the population that was distributed along the trade routes became concentrated on the centers. This population was highly affected by the economic competition of that time. The populations that moved into cities were faced with hardships which tested their patience, persistence, and adaptability. The Ottomans had to keep the system running under these social pressures.

The dynamics of trade were curious - even as early as the 1470s Greeks and Jews were the premier traders, not the Ottomans. Consequently, the Ottomans were forced to protect the Greek elite in order to maintain a functioning economy. They were, moreover, constantly obliged to deal with social unrest among the empire's Greek community. When the Greek elite turned against the Ottomans, the Empire lost control. The Greek elite blamed the economic problems on the Ottomans and offered an escape route to Greeks by persuing a nation of their own. In reality, even after the Greek revolution, the same elite was controlling the economy with the trade routes having already been altered.

By many accounts, the circumstances surrounding the fall of the Ottoman Empire closely paralleled the fall of Byzantium, particularly in terms of the ongoing tensions among the empires' populations and its inability to relate with them. In the case of the Ottomans, the introduction of a parliamentary system during the Tanzimat was too late to reverse the damage.

Economy

The economical structure of the Empire was defined by the geopolitical structure. The Ottoman Empire stood in between West and East, thus blocking the route eastward when Spanish and Portuguese navigators set out in search of a new route to the Orient. The Empire was holding the same path that Marco Polo once used. When Columbus discovered America, the Ottoman Empire was in its highest position as an economical power that extended over three continents. The current Ottoman studies imply that the change in politics between Ottomans and Central Europe did depend on the opening of the new sea routes. It is also possible to see the decay of the Ottoman Empire by tracing the loss of significance of the land routes. Decay is a very relative term, in reality while central Europe is moving forward, Ottoman were holding on to their traditions. The pragmatic thinking of Ottomans that once helped to reform the systems left behind by Roman Empire was once again giving out the same signs which Ottomans found centuries ago.

For more background on this topic, see The Capitulations of the Ottoman Empire.

Law

Main article: Law of the Ottoman Empire

Ottomans believed in solving the problems locally. Non-conflicting systems were by and large left alone. Ottoman system was a three court system composed from one for the Muslims with the kadi (read judges), one for the non-Muslim (appointed Jews and Christians ruled over their religious areas) and another for the trade (originated after the capitulations). Court that will be sought depends on the sides of the conflict. On top of everything was the Kanun Law (administrative in nature). These courts were not inclusive; Muslim court could cover a trade conflict or inter-religious cases. The primary law system was the Islamic courts.

As a systems of law, there were the Sharia Law and the Kanun Law. Ottoman state did not interfere with the other religious law systems, even if had a saying through local governors. The Sharia Law evolved out of the Koran and from the word of Mohammed. There was also Kanun Law which was the secular law of the Sultan. Both were taught at law schools, which existed in Bursa and Istanbul. The court was run by sultan-appointed kadi and often included punishments including but not limited to fines, lashings, and capital punishment.

Often Jews and Christians went to Islamic courts to get a more forceful ruling on an issue. Women almost always went to Islamic courts, as they tended to side more often with and gave fairer payments to women. In truth, the political judicial system was run for the betterment of the rulers. The Kanun overruled the Sharia Law, which show a level of respect for the Sultan over religion.

Military

Main article: Military of the Ottoman Empire

The Ottoman military was a complex system of recruiting and fief-holding. In the Ottoman army, light cavalry long formed the core and they were given fiefs called timars. Cavalry used bows and short swords and made use of nomad tactics similar to those of the Mongol Empire. The Ottoman army was once among the most advanced fighting forces in the world, being one of the first to employ muskets. The famous Janissary corps provided élite troops and bodyguards for the sultan. After the 17th century, however, the Ottomans could no longer produce a modern fighting force because of a lack of reforms, mainly because of the corrupted Janissaries. The abolition of the Janissary corps in 1826 was not enough, and in the war against Russia, the Ottoman Empire severely lacked modern weapons and technologies.

The modernisation of the Ottoman empire in the 19th century started with the military. This was the first institution to hire foreign experts and which sent their officer core for training in western European countries. Technology and new weapons were transferred to the Empire,such as German and British guns, Air force and a modern navy. The empire was successful in modernising its army. However, it was still no match against the major western powers.

“The beginnings of legal reform in the Middle East were initiated in the Ottoman Empire in the middle of the nineteenth century through the promulgation of commercial and penal codes such as the Ottoman Commercial code (1850) and the Ottoman Penal code (1858).” (Haddad, Y.Y., Byron H. and Ellison F., Eds.)

Culture

Main article: Culture of the Ottoman Empire

Ottoman culture covers expressive activities and the symbolic structures that happened under the umbrella of Ottoman Empire. That is an inclusive statement for all the religious and ethnic cultures of the state. Also, there is a specific intersecting culture that originated from living multi-cultural that reached to its highest levels among the Ottoman elites. Ottoman elites were not monolytic and composed of many different ethnic and religious people.

With the turn of nineteen century,nationalistic states including Turkey began to write their own history. Most of the references to Ottoman culture were buried either in the archives or destroyed. What we know about that period mainly originates from opposing state archives and their official view points. These references can not be claimed fair or inclusive. It is also hard to reach defending views given the fact that Ottomans ceased to exist. Current studies show that empire culture was very rich and colorful.

Opposing to wide spread beliefs, coming from a nomadic culture, Ottoman Turks was in peace with different cultures that they have in contact. Originally Ottomans belong to central-Asian culture. Ottomans later integrated Persian and Byzantine cultures into their way of life, instead of being assimilated into these cultures. When considering the Turkish folkloric or Ottoman elite art, we can see that they have conserved the colors and symbols that were inherited from their origins. Ottoman elites used Persian in their art to expressed their own inner world. The Ottoman court life was a harmony of Turkish and the Persian Shahs, but had many Byzantine and European influences.

This Ottoman multicultural perspective reflects on their policies. One of the reasons that Ottoman Empire lasted this long was the high tolerance policies pursued originating from their nomadic inheritance. This statement should be taken as a comparison to assimilative and ignorant medieval times (east and west). Ottoman State persuaded multi-cultural and multi-religious politics. When we talk about Ottoman tolerance, we talk about the structures that accommodate different perspectives. A good example was Ottoman justice system. Another can be cited with the local governors to the regions. As the Ottomans moved further west, the Ottoman leaders themselves absorbed some of the culture of the conquered regions. With the intercultural marriages, the new cultural structures were gradually added to the Ottomans, creating the characteristic Ottoman elite culture. When compared to common Turkish arts (folkloric), the assimilation of the Ottoman elites to these new cultures is apparent.

Religion

The Ottoman State never officially enforced religious conformity, nor did it harshly pursue a policy of individual conversion. The fact that opposition to the Ottoman state had always been on a national scale supports this idea. Going back to 1391, Bayzid I with Thessalonica, Ottoman state actively adapted policies of lenient behaviors towards who opposed him. The Sultans knew that their primary concern was to serve the interests of the state. The Ottoman state, could not survive without the toil, co-operation and taxes. Turks have never interested in the souls. The hierarchy of the Christian religion provided machinery to governance of the rias. There was no reason to apply influence on the public and private life’s of Christians. For centuries, the Ottoman Empire was often a refuge of the Jews of Europe, who were often persecuted, or expelled, from the countries of Christian Europe (see History of the Jews in Turkey). The Ottoman State's relation with the Orthodox Church was very peaceful; given the fact that current Orthodoxy extends directly back to Jesus and his Apostles through unbroken Apostolic Succession. Ottoman state kept the orthodox structure intact until the national uprisings. Currently under Patriarch Bartholomew I of İstanbul we can see encompassing national Orthodox jurisdictions such as Bulgarian Orthodox, Greek Orthodox, Russian Orthodox. Some of these policies were slowly changed with the adaptation of parliamentary monarch.

It is undeniable Constantinople itself was Turkified at least externally, such as changing its name. However, it is important to recognize that besides keeping the churches intact, but turning some into mosques, such as in Hagia Sophia, the conversion of the churches have been done carefully. After five centuries, in 1935-the complete removal of the plaster could be carried out, after the new Republic of Turkey, "in the interest of art," declared Hagia Sophia neither a mosque nor a church, but a museum. This very treatment of those old Christian mosaics - a treatment not of destruction but of conscious preservation - illustrates in a way the similar fate of the Christian people of Balkans who likewise enabled to resuscitate as nations and states.

For centuries, the Ottoman Empire, along with the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, were the refuges of the Jews of Europe.

An relatively unknown fact is that Ottomans supported the Protestantism as they were more close than Roman Catholicism.

External links

• Ottoman Web Site - Contains detailed information about the Ottoman Empire
• Royal Ark: Turkey - Extensive site with a lot of detailed information
• World Civilizations: The Ottomans - Comprehensive site that covers much about the state and the government
• Turkcebilgi.com Ottoman Empire Pages - (in Turkish)
• The Ottomans - Covers various aspects of the Ottoman Empire in detail
• Flags of Ottoman Empire
• Capitals of Ottoman Empire
• Everything About Ottoman Empire - Everything about the history and culture of Ottoman Empire (in Turkish)

References

• Barbara Jelavich, History of the Balkans, Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries, Cambridge University Press, 1983. ISBN 0521252490. See "Balkan Christians under Ottoman Rule", pages 39-126.
• Colin Imber, The Ottoman Empire, 1300–1650: The Structure of Power, 2002. ISBN 0333613864.
• Gülru Necipoglu Architecture, Ceremonial, and Power: The Topkapi Palace in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries, 1991. ISBN 0262140500.
• This article incorporates text from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, which is in the public domain.

bg:Османска империя bs:Osmansko Carstvo ca:Imperi Otomà cs:Osmanská říše cy:Yr Ymerodraeth Ottoman da:Osmanniske Rige de:Osmanisches Reich el:Οθωμανική Αυτοκρατορία es:Imperio Otomano eo:Osmanida imperio fr:Empire ottoman gl:Imperio Otomán ko:오스만 제국 id:Kerajaan Ottoman ia:Imperio Ottoman it:Impero Ottomano he:האימפריה העות'מאנית ku:Împaratoriya Osmanî lt:Osmanų imperija hu:Oszmán Birodalom mk:Отоманска Империја ms:Empayar Turki Uthmaniyyah nl:Ottomaanse Rijk ja:オスマン帝国 no:Det ottomanske rike nn:Det ottomanske riket pl:Imperium osmańskie pt:Império Otomano ro:Imperiul Otoman ru:Османская Империя sl:Otomansko cesarstvo sr:Отоманско царство fi:Osmanien valtakunta sv:Osmanska riket tr:Osmanlı Devleti zh:奥斯曼帝国